<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SAST Wingees &#187; Skepticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sastwingees.org/tag/skepticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sastwingees.org</link>
	<description>Knowledge is Scrumptious</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:15:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Truth About Meditation</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2011/04/09/the-truth-about-meditation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sastwingees.org/2011/04/09/the-truth-about-meditation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 03:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Priya Raju</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meditation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skepticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/?p=2688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetVery many logical fallacies are mentioned in this post. For a description of these and other fallacies, please see this link. Whenever I talk about breathing exercises, I refer to Pranayama, an integral part of Meditation, without which the benefits of meditation will be even less. &#8211; Author. Author: You know, I’ve been thinking about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[            <a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="" data-text="The Truth About Meditation" data-via="" data-url="http://www.sastwingees.org/2011/04/09/the-truth-about-meditation/" >Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><div class="sticky_post"><p><span style="color: #008000;"><em>Very many logical fallacies are mentioned in this post. For a description of these and other fallacies, please see <a href="http://changingminds.org/disciplines/argument/argument.htm">this link</a>. Whenever I talk about breathing exercises, I refer to Pranayama, an integral part of Meditation, without which the benefits of meditation will be even less. &#8211; Author.</em></span></p>
<p><strong>Author</strong>: You know, I’ve been thinking about meditation. I’m wondering how a simple breathing technique – inhale, exhale – can provide all these health benefits that people claim.</p>
<p><strong>Friend</strong>: You’re always like this – questioning our ancestral legacy. You attack anything that’s intrinsically Indian. You always do this, don’t you?</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: Nothing like a trite <span style="color: #0000ff;"><em>Ad Hominem</em></span> attack, huh? You’re attacking me and my character &#8211; But, that’s not in discussion now. We’re trying to understand if meditation has any benefits other than short-term stress reduction. Let’s stick to the point, shall we?</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: Come on, meditation is not the new kid on the block. People have meditated forever, its our tradition. Its well established.</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: Ah, the <span style="color: #0000ff;"><em>Ad antiquitatem</em></span> fallacy &#8211; An Appeal to Tradition. Just because something is part of our tradition doesn’t make it right. We can’t defend something only because we’ve been doing it for ages.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: So you think meditation provides no benefits? That’s preposterous!</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: First of all, I’m not saying meditation provides no benefits. We all know how stress comes down if we breathe in to a brown paper bag. I’m sure meditation reduces stress in the short term. It can also make sad people feel better by calming them down.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: Is that all there is to meditation? How dare you impugn meditation? Do you know how many people it provides relief to?</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: Calm down, <span style="color: #0000ff;"><em>Anger</em></span> is another logical fallacy. I’m merely trying to understand if there’s any irrefutable proof that meditation provides other benefits. If it indeed helps people, tell me how. I’m really curious to know.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: Ok, I’ve heard that it has cured Multiple Sclerosis and even AIDS. How about that?</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: Carl Sagan, in his <a href="http://users.tpg.com.au/users/tps-seti/baloney.html">Baloney Detection Kit</a> says that – Whenever possible, there must be an independent verification of the facts. Now, do you have a link that proves that an unbiased 3<sup>rd</sup> party of medical professionals has verified these claims?</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: Can you tell me why my claim seems untenable to you?</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: Simply because Multiple Sclerosis in a severe neurological problem, where the myelin sheath covering the neurons degrades. If Multiple Sclerosis was cured, that would mean the Myelin Sheath grew back. I would need a Before &amp; After MRI scan of the patient. Plus, AIDS is an immunodeficiency caused by a virus. I would need a Before &amp; After lab report.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: Before you proceed, let me tell you that you don’t know meditation can’t cure Multiple Sclerosis and AIDS. It could be true, you know? There’s so much we don’t know about the world.</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: While I do agree that we don’t know enough about the world, let me point out that you just committed the <span style="color: #0000ff;"><em>Ad Ignorantium</em></span> fallacy – An Argument of Ignorance. You can prove your point only by providing supporting evidence, not by taking solace in stating the opponents don’t know for sure if its false.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: I know that meditation has improved my gastro-intestinal problem. I know people whose memory has improved too!</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: Most – if not all – idiopathic GI tract problems are caused by or aggravated by stress. Meditation aids in stress-related problems too – in fact, its great for that. Short-term memory is another aspect that is worsened by stress. I’m repeating myself – meditation does help reduce stress, I have already conceded that.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: I know people whose migraine was cured by meditation!</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: <em><span style="color: #0000ff;">Post-hoc ergo propter hoc</span></em>? Headache reduction followed after the person started meditating, so the meditation cured the headache?  For science to accept that meditation cured a person’s migraine, a proper cause and effect must be established. Do you know for a fact that the patient wasn’t on prophylactics? And how long did you study the patient to ensure that the migraines had indeed disappeared?</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: But you accepted that meditation cures stress-induced illnesses. Are you changing your stance now?</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: While stress could be one of the triggers of migraine, it should not be confused with tension headaches. Migraine is a neurological problem caused by a defect in 3 separate genes. You can’t convince me that breathing in &amp; out cures a genetic defect.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: I’m sure many studies have been done on the efficacy of meditation. I can pull several studies off the Internet &amp; shove them up your…</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: Its interesting that you mention that. Do you know, they did a Meta Study – A study of all studies done on meditation, around 800+ of them. And they concluded that none of the studies followed proper protocol – and that the study results were at best – inconclusive.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: Meaning? Meaning what?</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: Meaning, meditation may help patients, but there’s no proof so far – no incontrovertible study done so far. It may be beneficial, but we don’t know for a fact.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: This is all a conspiracy to discredit ancient Indian medicine. I tell you, meditation works, but these doctors have covered it up. It is so effective, it will be too much of a competition for them.</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: You’re spewing logical fallacies by the minute. This one is called a <span style="color: #0000ff;"><em>Conspiracy Theory</em></span>. To prove a conspiracy theory, its not enough if you assume intent, you have to provide data of a cover-up.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: But why is it so difficult to understand the benefits of meditation?</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: That’s because there are so many types of meditation, with many variables. Some combine meditation with yoga. Some combine hand <em>mudras</em> with meditation. Others emphasize on focusing on a specific point, while a few others say you must negate all thought.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: So if someone claims they improved their flexibility or hand dexterity because of meditation…</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: It could be due to the yoga or due to the mudras, not about the breathing in &amp; out. You see the problem?</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: So many people believe in meditation. Can it be wrong?</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: Wow, you did it again &#8211; Another logical fallacy. <em><span style="color: #0000ff;">Appeal to Common Belief </span>-</em> Just because many people believe in something, its not necessarily true.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: But..What about Alpha waves? I’ve heard that meditation increases the Alpha waves in the brain. And I’ve read that alpha waves improve immunity and provide a host of other benefits.</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: Alpha waves are produced when you’re not focusing on anything. You don&#8217;t need to meditate for that &#8211; simply close your eyes, think of nothing in particular &amp; your brain will generate alpha waves. There’s nothing earth-shaking about them. It denotes an absence of visual processing. There&#8217;s no proof that it promotes serenity or creativity. Also, different types of meditation produce different waves. Theta Meditation purportedly creates Theta waves, Zen Meditation produces Alpha and Theta waves, while the Kriya Yoga produces Beta waves.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: So, even Tibetan Compassion Meditation is useless?</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: On the contrary, its very useful. Its like daydreaming, putting yourself in a compassionate mode, making you ponder about a word. It will bring about behavioral modification.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: Perhaps meditation provides different benefits to different people. Perhaps some people derive all the afore-mentioned benefits from it. Can we agree to that compromise?</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: Certainly not. That’s another fallacy, called a <span style="color: #0000ff;"><em>False Compromise</em></span>. We don’t have to agree to a compromise, just to avoid polarization. That’s not how discussions should go. We should try to find out what the benefits really are.</p>
<p><strong>F</strong>: So what are you trying to do now? Prove meditation is useless?</p>
<p><strong>A</strong>: I’ve already agreed that meditation has some benefits. I want to know what people think. Quoting Carl Sagan again, one should encourage substantive debate of a topic by knowledgeable proponents. So my objective is to find out what the readers of this blog think.</p>
<p><span style="color: #993366;"><em>Dear readers – This is an open-minded discussion. We&#8217;d love to know your thoughts on the subject. Please provide links from <strong>independent</strong> sources whenever possible.</em></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sastwingees.org/2011/04/09/the-truth-about-meditation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alternative Medicine: Take 2</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/21/alternative-medicine-take-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/21/alternative-medicine-take-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Priya Raju</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skepticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/21/alternative-medicine-take-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetIn my previous post, I had outlined some basic methods to distinguish good medicine from barking mad therapies. In this post, let&#8217;s dig deeper to see how the tricksters abuse science to confound lay-people. Chain of Evidence First, I have to debunk some ill-conceived notions about science &#38; formal medicine. Science does not dismiss unproven [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[            <a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="" data-text="Alternative Medicine: Take 2" data-via="" data-url="http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/21/alternative-medicine-take-2/" >Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><p>In my <a href="http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/15/alternative-therapies-take-1/">previous post</a>, I had outlined some basic methods to distinguish good medicine from barking mad therapies. In this post, let&#8217;s dig deeper to see how the tricksters abuse science to confound lay-people.</p>
<p><strong>Chain of Evidence</strong><br />
First, I have to debunk some ill-conceived notions about science &amp; formal medicine. Science does not dismiss unproven healing methods, ideas or experiences right away. It systematically looks for evidence in an unbiased manner &#8211; and then, based on the outcome, chooses to support (or oppose) the proposed idea. Most importantly, it also tries to reproduce the reported success of the healing method &#8211; after understanding the conditions under which it manifests itself.</p>
<p>Science is not just based on experiments &amp; personal observation. Several scientists have predicted outcomes thru Math, theories &amp; repeating patterns &#8211; well before any evidence could be found. Mendeleev predicted the characteristics of several elements before they were discovered. Einstein dreamed up his Theories of Relativity first, proved it next. It was possible for him to do that because &#8211; he knew all the facts &amp; principles leading to it.</p>
<p>Which brings us to &#8220;Chain of Evidence&#8221;, one of the corner-stones of science. Every new earth-shaking theory is like a chain of concepts, proven data points or experiments. For the final link in the chain (i.e., the new theory) to be correct, every link in the chain should be correct. How can we ensure that every chain in our reasoning is correct? By relying on scientific methods.</p>
<p>Quacks shouldn&#8217;t be taken seriously because &#8211; They are unable prove any/most of the links in their thinking. Their basic premises veer far from scientifically accepted principles. It is no surprise then that their theories are heckled by established scientific institutions the world over. They only seem to succeed in the public domain because &#8211; the general populace has very little knowledge on science. This means the charlatans have a field day &amp; continue their vaudeville act.</p>
<p><strong>Science is &#8220;Too Narrow&#8221;</strong><br />
I have a problem with squawking popinjays that claim their pet theories are 100% scientific, but when pressed for proof &#8211; throw a hissy fit, accuse everyone of being narrow minded &amp; start ranting about how science is useless to understand the nuances in life. They may also say that science hasn&#8217;t &#8220;caught up&#8221; with them. Possibly &amp; I hope it never does.</p>
<p>This double-speak gives me conniption fits. I just wish they&#8217;ll answer some simple questions, so that I can stop the woozy feeling in my head.</p>
<p>1. Folks &#8211; Your claims are either scientific or not. Make up your mind. Which is it?</p>
<p>2. If you think science is inadequate to explain your technique, why do you use scientific terms to explain it?</p>
<p>3. If you truly believe in what you say &#8211; Why do you resist all attempts by the scientific community to independently theorize, conceptualize, measure or analyze your claims &amp; report findings?</p>
<p>4. If you think science is ill equipped to prove the veracity of you claims &#8211; How in the blazes did you conclude that your claims are scientific in the 1st place?</p>
<p>And finally &#8211; Narrating one anecdote after another is called &#8220;hearsay&#8221; &#8211; its not the same as providing verifiable supporting evidence.</p>
<p><strong>Appeal to Authority</strong><br />
Since most people are not savvy about science, quacks get their attention easily by invoking the names of authority figures. Check if they make references to Tesla, Bohr, Farraday or other dead scientists &#8211; who can&#8217;t even whimper their protests from their grave. Such &#8220;Dead Scientists Societies&#8221; are very useful, since even lay-people know their names.</p>
<p>Like most crooks, quacks are getting smarter &amp; smarter. Sadly, the same can&#8217;t be said about their victims. Tricksters usually play &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; by &#8220;cloaking&#8221; their shlock in scientific jargon like &#8220;Energy Fields&#8221;, &#8220;Molecular Clusters&#8221; &amp; &#8220;Quantum Vibrations&#8221;. They&#8217;ll explain all these concepts admirably, but fail to explain scientifically how any of them have a bearing on the pseudo-scientific geegaw that they are selling. By juxtaposing their ideas with valid science, these nutters hope that a smidgen of the respect you have for physics will rub off on the sleaze that they are selling. They also hope fervently that this new-found respect will make you swallow all your questions &amp; start believing them.</p>
<p>Excusez moi, but me thinks that it stinks <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Let me illustrate with some scintillating giberish that I&#8217;ve encountered. &#8220;During healing, the brain wave patterns of practitioner and receiver pulse in unison with the earth&#8217;s magnetic field, known as the Schumann Resonance. During these moments, the biomagnetic field of the practitioners&#8217; hands is at least 1000 times greater than normal, and not as a result of internal body current&#8221;. Well, that&#8217;s illuminating <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Let me clutch my sides for a sec &#8211; I&#8217;m laughing so hard they are about to fall off. First of all, Schumann Resonance is &#8220;Electromagnetic&#8221; &#8211; not just &#8220;Magentic&#8221;: the berks can&#8217;t spell &#8220;Electromagnetic&#8221; yet?? <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  Second, its a standing-wave that will manifest itself only when a lightning strike excites the cavity between the atmosphere &amp; the earth&#8217;s crust. Third, its not some magical energy field that can be &#8220;channelized&#8221; by people &#8211; unless you want to get hit by a lightning &amp; join the party. And lastly, maybe I&#8217;ve missed it &#8211; did you catch them providing any evidence on their healing method&#8217;s mystical connection with Schumann resonance? Other than hearsay?</p>
<p>See what I mean? They&#8217;ve successfully distracted people, but they still haven&#8217;t proved a thing. They invoked Winfried Schumann, just like our ancestors invoked Mitra, Indra, Dagon or Zeus &#8211; to dissuade others from bothering them. They keep lives interesting for skeptics though <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>We are Too Stupid</strong><br />
When all else fails, they attack the arguer. This is a logical fallacy called <em>Ad Hominem</em> &#8211; Attacking the arguer instead of the argument. As in, they may blame us for being too stupid or too rigid to understand them &amp; the possibilities they weave out of their imaginations.</p>
<p>An acquaintance once told me &#8211; &#8220;You know, I can heal people over the phone! The scientific (!) principle of Remote Healing relies on both me &amp; the patient having access to the universal energy waves around us&#8221;.  I sighed &#8211; life is indeed trying for a skeptic. I asked him &#8211; &#8220;No kidding? You can send healing signals pulsating over ether?&#8221;. He didn&#8217;t see what was coming, so he proudly puffed himself up &amp; said &#8220;Yes!&#8221;.</p>
<p>I asked him calmly &#8220;If that&#8217;s true, why don&#8217;t you beam your magic pulses to Africa &amp; cure all AIDS victims?&#8221;. He went pale &amp; made some inconsequential noises about how Africans should want to get healed first. Nonsense &#8211; As if AIDS victims love the company of the HIV virus &amp; can&#8217;t bear to be parted from it! I snorted &amp; nearly said &#8220;Bollocks!&#8221; &#8211; but feigned a polite silence. He was already &#8220;Checkmated with Candles &amp; Balloons&#8221; &#8211; as my brother used to say. Well, he also blew raspberries whenever he said that &#8211; He was a rare one for capturing the gravity of a situation <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Forewarned is Forearmed! My love for debunking runs deep. I may post a follow-up to this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/21/alternative-medicine-take-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alternative Medicine: Take 1</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/15/alternative-therapies-take-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/15/alternative-therapies-take-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Priya Raju</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skepticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/15/alternative-therapies-take-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetTalking about oneself is crass solipsism at worst &#38; a crashing bore at best. Be that as it may, I have to resort to some over-sharing &#8211; all for a good porpoise, I mean, purpose. Fear not, I won&#8217;t make this a meandering personal narrative. So, bear with me. Or not &#8211; At this mo&#8217;, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[            <a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="" data-text="Alternative Medicine: Take 1" data-via="" data-url="http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/15/alternative-therapies-take-1/" >Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><p><strong>Talking</strong> about oneself is crass solipsism at worst &amp; a crashing bore at best. Be that as it may, I have to resort to some over-sharing &#8211; all for a good porpoise, I mean, purpose. Fear not, I won&#8217;t make this a meandering personal narrative. So, bear with me. Or not &#8211; At this mo&#8217;, I don&#8217;t particularly care which.</p>
<p><font color="#993366"><em>{Flashback Fades In Here}</em> </font>Many years back, I developed a stomach ailment &#8211; Acid Reflux, to be precise. &#8220;Developed&#8221; &#8211; What a word, as if I&#8217;m a photographer working on a roll of film <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  It was particularly severe &amp; my doctor hyper-ventilated whenever she heard my symptoms. I had to pat her back sympathetically. She set out heart-breaking wails every time she upped my dosage. My family became woozy with worry when the doctor started bringing in interns to study my &#8220;interesting case&#8221;. So in the Winter of 2001, a relative offered to cure me thru Reiki.</p>
<p>&#8220;Just believe fully in my powers to cure you!&#8221; his voice fluted pleasantly. I had to lie down on the sofa &amp; close my eyes. &#8220;Er, what happens then?&#8221; I asked, cheering up. Alternative medicine is glamorous if nothing else &#8211; so I was hoping for fancy-shmancy pyrotechnics. &#8220;I move my hands above your stomach for 10 minutes!&#8221;. &#8220;What, that&#8217;s all?&#8221; I asked, outraged. Any reader of my post knows I&#8217;m a skeptic: I was deeply suspicious of Reiki by now. I&#8217;ve swallowed enough Zantac to fell a giant, 1 of the interns opined that I had no oesophagus left &amp; hence had no business to be alive &#8211; and this bloke thought randomly flailing his arms would cure me.</p>
<p>I chewed my nails for a few minutes pensively. There are many things that we don&#8217;t know. So I agreed in-principle that Reiki might work. I suspended all judgement &amp; put myself in his hands &#8211; literally. After the session, he asked me &#8220;Did you feel your body bounce off the sofa? That usually happens during healing!&#8221; I mulled over this honestly &amp; told him &#8211; &#8220;No&#8221;. &#8220;But, you must feel some heat on the stomach now!&#8221; he piped in, crest-fallen. &#8220;Er, my acidity keeps my stomach rather hot &amp; lively all the time. I didn&#8217;t feel anything unusual. And I don&#8217;t feel better either&#8221; I said helpfully. &#8220;I&#8230;I can&#8217;t continue this treatment&#8221; he said nervously. &#8220;Why not? I persisted.<em> <font color="#993366">{Flashback Fades Out Here}</font></em></p>
<p><strong>The Stitch On My Side</strong><br />
Seriously now. I&#8217;ve been watching with increasing discomfort at how the mind-share of science is shrinking in the 21st century. Its premature to order a coffin &#8211; but educated people are ready to jump head-long into any &#8220;New Age Cure&#8221; flapdoodle. Pseudo-scientific healing methods spring up more quickly these days than mushrooms after a rain. For the record, science doesn&#8217;t brush aside anything that can&#8217;t be proven. If some form of alternative medicine is unable to show how it works, but is able to cure patients &#8211; I won&#8217;t attempt to deconstruct it. The means or the end &#8211; if neither can be shown &#8211; stop sniveling. Skeptics will jump in for the kill, with pleasure.</p>
<p>If you came to this site wanting to hear plaudits sung on Alternative Medicine, you&#8217;ll be sorely disappointed. I&#8217;ll explain as lucidly as possible why I don&#8217;t have a scintilla of belief in unproven methods. Now, how should we go about methodically figuring out whether an Alternative Healing technique is any good? Here are some indications that some mischief is afoot &amp; all&#8217;s not well in Eden:</p>
<p><strong>Power of Placebos</strong><br />
If the miracle cure says, &#8220;You&#8217;ve gotta believe in it for it to work&#8221; &#8211; That&#8217;s a clear signal that they absolve themselves of all responsibility. If the treatment didn&#8217;t work, they can always blame it on your &#8220;attitude&#8221;. If it does work, they get free word-of-mouth publicity. Either way, they win. If it works, its the &#8220;Placebo Effect&#8221; &#8211; also called &#8220;Faith Healing&#8221; &#8211; masquerading as new age jiggery-pokery.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Placebo Effect&#8221; is a well documented phenomenon, where the patient feels better &#8211; not because of the munificence of the treatment, but because the patient believes fully in it. Most of the benign alternative therapies work this way, by harnessing your own belief. Approximately, 35% of the people are susceptible &amp; they feel marginally to considerably better after ingesting placebos. Pharmaceutical companies have to conduct Double-blind Experiments &#8211; Where the experimenter doesn&#8217;t know who the &#8220;Test&#8221; &amp; &#8220;Control&#8221; subjects are. They are expected to prove that their drugs work better than &#8220;Sugar Pills&#8221; &#8211; which is what is used as placebos in their control experiments. Ergo, they have to prove that their remedies work as advertised.</p>
<p>Practitioners of quackery have no such obligations. What isn&#8217;t rigorously tested may not work.</p>
<p><strong>Nature &lt;&gt; Benign</strong><br />
I was jawing with my hair-dresser Amy on her mom&#8217;s impending menopause. Amy said &#8220;Oh, I&#8217;ve put my mom on natural estrogen!&#8221; &#8211; She was positively beaming &amp; looked at me like a Labrador Retriever in dire need of petting. &#8220;Ah &#8211; Excellent. But, Amy, have you checked with her doctor before starting her on this?&#8221; I asked. &#8220;B-But &#8211; Plant Estrogens are natural!!&#8221; said Amy indignantly. &#8220;Well, I wouldn&#8217;t try it without a doctor&#8217;s say-so&#8221; I persisted. &#8220;Really? Not even something Natural?&#8221; wondered Amy, banishing further thought. As far as she was concerned, that settled it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, Rattlesnake Venom &amp; Latin American Toad Poison are natural. Hot Lava cremating us ahead of schedule is natural. A tiger chomping someone&#8217;s butt off is natural. Heck, aging &amp; death are natural. I don&#8217;t see you queueing up for any of that!&#8221; &#8211; I said. Actually, I didn&#8217;t. My good sense prevailed. Arguing with someone wielding scissors is a no-no in my book.</p>
<p>Just because natural drugs don&#8217;t have &#8220;chemicals&#8221; doesn&#8217;t make them good for you. There are definitely some very beneficial natural therapies &#8211; but it would be a fallacy to think they are good because they are natural. Before you lose fistful of $$ for that natural remedy, research it for contra-indications. For all you know, it may be a poison. Or, it may interact with other drugs that you take.</p>
<p><strong>Weasel Words</strong><br />
Look for &#8220;Weasel Words&#8221;, the Lingua Franca of quacks. The advertiser may manipulate you by hiding behind ambiguity, by being dodgy, shifty &amp; crafty. Stated simply, you can&#8217;t accuse them of being straight arrows <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Examples are:</p>
<p>1. &#8220;Studies done by leading doctors prove this!!!&#8221; &#8211; Which doctors did this study? Who determined they are &#8220;leading&#8221;? Who commissioned the study?<br />
2. &#8220;It has been well accepted that our capsule gives excellent results!!!&#8221; &#8211; Accepted by whom? Define &#8220;Excellence&#8221; in terms of relief &#8211; 10%, 20% &#8211; What?<br />
3. &#8220;90% of the people saw improvement after our electro-static massage!!!&#8221; &#8211; How many people were studied? How many times was this study repeated? &#8220;Improvement&#8221; is an ambiguous word &#8211; How did the subjects feel 1, 3 or 6 months after the treatment?</p>
<p>Such claimants hope that you won&#8217;t poke your nose &amp; demand specifics. If their treatment is so good, why don&#8217;t they get an FDA certification? Or, publish their findings before an August committee of doctors, who can independently verify their claims? You&#8217;d think they&#8217;ll be making a beeline to present their therapy &amp; win the Nobel! If their claims are true, they will. On the other hand, if they are liars &amp; cheats, they have every reason to avoid peer reviews.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Ancient Therapy&#8221; Ploys</strong><br />
Some of you may now say, &#8220;There are age old cures that work, you git!&#8221;. Granted, there are some ancient therapies that work. Neem extracts, Tea Tree Oil (good for nail fungus ; for the nail, I mean &#8211; not the fungus), Vajradanti Tooth Powder, Candied ginger for nausea &#8211; its a long list. Most &#8211; not all &#8211; of these cures were arrived upon by the ancient people after repeated experimentation &amp; observation. That&#8217;s the basis of science.</p>
<p>But, before using any &#8220;ancient&#8221; therapy, check how old it really is. Reiki for e.g., is touted as an ancient therapy &#8211; if you consider &#8220;150 years old&#8221; ancient <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  So, to get public benediction, a shyster simply needs to state that their therapy is based &#8220;On the Ancient Wisdom of Japan/China/Tibet/India&#8221;. Poor Iraq, Iran &amp; Egypt. They have older cultures, but they haven&#8217;t managed to capture sufficient woo-woo mind-share.</p>
<p>Please note that modern practitioners of ancient therapies make marked departures from the proscribed medical texts! Some acupuncturists for e.g. &#8211; pass a mild current thru the needles. I may be wrong, but something tells me that electricity wasn&#8217;t freely available 1000 years back <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Still think its based on &#8220;age old&#8221; wisdom?</p>
<p>Some of the ancient therapies &#8211; we know now &#8211; are extremely harmful. Certain Ayurvedic medicines use Antimony compounds &#8211; and they are as toxic as Arsenic. Semi-literate people scoop, pound &amp; package these chemicals cheerfully. What, they are gonna exercise special precaution because you are buying? Improper synthesis of such drugs can kill you. Per Ayurvedic texts, these compounds should be fired at a certain temperature to lose their toxicity. And no qualified person is regulating all this. If someone is dead set (pun intended) in popping these pills, I&#8217;ll get some for them <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>Summing Up</strong><br />
Consider this &#8211; There&#8217;s no money in skepticism &amp; cart-loads in mumbo-jumbo. Who is more likely to gip you? Me or them? I have to catch my breath &#8211; None of us is getting younger &amp; I&#8217;m totally winded out after all this pontificating.</p>
<p>Whenever I exhibit my inner skeptic, I get hate mail from people, threatening a punch in my solar plexus &#8211; and I didn&#8217;t know I had this &#8220;solar&#8221; gimcrack <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' />  If I&#8217;m not killed or maimed &#8211; and otherwise feel reasonably alive &amp; limping, I&#8217;ll pen a follow-up post on  how quacks abuse science to confound people &amp; sell more of their tripe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/15/alternative-therapies-take-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millenium Bat Awards</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/30/millenium-bat-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/30/millenium-bat-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Priya Raju</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paranormal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skepticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/30/millenium-bat-awards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetDear Readers, I&#8217;ve been thinking. And that should make you very nervous &#8211; almost as nervous as a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs. So far, I&#8217;ve wrought nothing but mischief with my thinking. This is a fair warning: I&#8217;ve been using the spaghetti between my ears. There are so many awards [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[            <a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="" data-text="Millenium Bat Awards" data-via="" data-url="http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/30/millenium-bat-awards/" >Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script><p>Dear Readers, I&#8217;ve been thinking. And that should make you very nervous &#8211; almost as nervous as a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs. So far, I&#8217;ve wrought nothing but mischief with my thinking. This is a fair warning: I&#8217;ve been using the spaghetti between my ears.</p>
<p>There are so many awards given out each year &#8211; Nobel, Pulitzer, Booker, Sahitya Academy, Peabody, Oscar, Grammy &#8211; its a long list. For people that inspire others thru exalted performance. For people that set a high-water mark for human endeavor. For people who open new doors in the quest for knowledge. For people that are brilliant.</p>
<p>But what about the dumb &amp; the batty, huh? What, no awards for them?? Isn&#8217;t that tantamount to discrimination? I&#8217;m particularly distressed that we don&#8217;t have awards to recognize charlatans, quacks &amp; assorted purveyors of pseudo-science. So, I decided to rectify this grievous miscarriage of justice. IMHO, such people deserve awards ceremonies amidst fanfare. I decided to give out awards for those that are so batty that &#8220;batty&#8221; ain&#8217;t the word to describe them anymore. And the ones that bamboozle simple folk, because &#8211; well, their bam is just too easy to boozle <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I announce the &#8220;Millenium Bat Awards&#8221;, the awards for the snake-oil selling crocodiles. I give out these awards only once in 1000 years, so pay attention. Winners have been selected for furthering the cause of science: their ideas are so bizarre, that their very mention will make sensible people say &#8220;YEWWW!&#8221;. I believe that this &#8220;YEWWW!&#8221; factor will send people careening towards genuine science.</p>
<p>What kind of bats-in-the-belfry ideas are high in &#8220;YEWWW!&#8221; factor? Take utter bunkum like the <a href="http://www.takionic.biz/info/tachyon.htm">takionic headbands</a>. For a mere $29.95, you can get a head or wrist-band that will counter your stress levels. Its the elastic equivalent of the happy pill, &#8220;Prozac&#8221;. Its energy is harnessed from &#8220;Tachyons that are not from the electro-magnetic spectrum. They are (drum-roll, please) Magneto-Electric!&#8221;. Gee, that sounds scientific! Thank God James Clerk Maxwell is dead. If he were alive, he&#8217;ll be so depressed that he&#8217;ll need a takionic wrist-band.</p>
<p>Now, for the awards &#8211; &#8220;Delirious Dingbat&#8221; and &#8220;Wonky Wombat&#8221;. There&#8217;s a certain hierarchy &amp; a pecking order in these awards. DD is easier to get than WW. Sort of like the difference between Padma Shri &amp; Padma Bhushan given by the Indian government. Only the &#8220;Padma&#8221; awards are for heroes. And mine are for crackpots. Indeedy yes!</p>
<p>I regret that I had to overlook a few stellar performers for these awards. Deepak Chopra &#8211; His accomplishments straddle several disciplines. Quantum Physics, Neurology, Philosophy, Logic, Statistics, Religion, Psychology. If we let him compete, he&#8217;ll win all the awards hands-down &#8211; so, in the spirit of competition, I had to drop this over-achiever. Tom Cruise &#8211; For his immense contributions to Religion &amp; Philosophy. I was particularly moved by his <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/28/business/media/28cruise.html?ref=business">latest Youtube video</a> where he talks with wisdom (&amp; without blinking, if I may add) about KSW, E-Meters &amp; Thetans. But since the Church of Scientology relentlessly sues people for slander, I had to reluctantly drop Tommy from my list. And Dinesh D&#8217;Souza? Give that man a few more years, I say. He has tremendous potential. As it is, he&#8217;s just warming up.</p>
<p>I award Uri Geller the &#8220;Delirious Dingbat&#8221; award. Geller is known for his prowess in bending spoons &#8211; &#8220;Psychokinesis&#8221;. He would merely &#8220;stroke&#8221; the spoons for a few minutes &amp; voila, &#8211; they broke into 2 pieces! Not to mention &#8220;Telepathy&#8221; &#8211; He could describe hidden drawings! Many people were hysterical, ecstatic or both &amp; hailed their latest Messiah.</p>
<p>Ah, but there were a few flies in the ointment. Many magicians did the things Geller did, using simple &#8220;Parlor Tricks&#8221; &#8211; without claiming to be &#8220;Psychokinetic&#8221;. Noted skeptic James Randi was one of them. Nobel Laureate Physicist Richard Feynman, who needs no introduction, stated that Geller couldn&#8217;t bend his car keys <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Geller routinely used his &#8220;Telepathic&#8221; powers to predict the outcome of sports events &#8211; only to be routinely wrong. Geller faced a public denouement on national TV in <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9w7jHYriFo">Johnny Carson&#8217;s program</a>: You see, he couldn&#8217;t bend Carson&#8217;s spoons. His tricks only worked on spoons from the Geller home <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In spite of all this, people believed Geller, more voceiferously than ever. Because he claimed to be a Juju man. And he is utterly believable, right? The fact that he once was an amateur magician can&#8217;t have a bearing on anything, would it?</p>
<p>Masaru Emoto gets the &#8220;Wonky Wombat&#8221; award. Emoto is known for his New Age Woo Woo stuff of &#8220;<a href="http://www.life-enthusiast.com/twilight/research_emoto.htm">Messages from Water</a>&#8220;. He says that your thoughts have a deep impact &amp; hence, positive thoughts are better. So far, I agree. But the dude went on to postulate how our &#8220;vibrations&#8221;, words, thoughts and music have a profound effect on the crystal structure of snow &amp; ice. He took pretty pictures of these crystals &amp; published it as a book to drive home his point.</p>
<p>Water must be a very impressionable &amp; confused beverage that needs therapy. Water from city reservoirs formed ugly crystals &#8211; but when they heard chanting from a priest, they felt better &amp; arranged themselves into beautiful crystals. It didn&#8217;t stop there. Apparently, water can read very well. Emoto typed a few names on a piece of paper &amp; tagged it to ice trays. Pretty crystals formed when the name tag &#8220;Mother Theresa&#8221; was affixed &#8211; and ugly crystals when &#8220;Adolf Hitler&#8221; was affixed. Hey, I&#8217;m not making this up. Its all in his book.</p>
<p>Its unclear at this point if water from Japan (where Emoto carried out his experiments) can only read Japanese, or can do equally well with English or Spanish <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Skeptics have challenged Emoto to do a double-blind study, where the experimenter won&#8217;t know what words the water was exposed to. They also want him to publish photographs of different parts of the ice specimen. I don&#8217;t know what his plans are, but I&#8217;m not waiting with bated breath. As Andy Warhol famously noted, Emoto got his 15 minutes of fame. And sold his books.</p>
<p><em>Albert Einstein once said, &#8220;The most beautiful and profound emotion we can experience is the sensation of the mystical. It is the power of all true science.” I&#8217;m not immune to the allure of mystery. Mysteries give us the scope to think, to analyze, to imagine, to expand our knowledge. If someone can really exhibit paranormal powers, for e.g. &#8211; I&#8217;ll be blown away. But before that, I&#8217;ll ask many, many questions to ascertain the truth. And then, I&#8217;ll try to find out how it happens. For you don&#8217;t leave a mystery alone. The beauty of a mystery is in cracking it.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/30/millenium-bat-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

