<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American politics and religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sastwingees.org/2009/01/19/american-politics-and-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2009/01/19/american-politics-and-religion/</link>
	<description>Knowledge is Scrumptious</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vamsi</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2009/01/19/american-politics-and-religion/comment-page-2/#comment-7995</link>
		<dc:creator>Vamsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/?p=1091#comment-7995</guid>
		<description>Senthil, 

Why are you ignoring/simply putting this important issue under the carpet? What is the bias you are talking about? Can you please explain? 

Also check the title of the post. It is about America because the author and almost everybody in this community are impacted/ influenced by America. Why America? You read the above comments in chronological order, then you get answers to all questions raised in your conclusive comment.

And, you should not conclude by tweaking the message that is black and white in the same post and few comments above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senthil, </p>
<p>Why are you ignoring/simply putting this important issue under the carpet? What is the bias you are talking about? Can you please explain? </p>
<p>Also check the title of the post. It is about America because the author and almost everybody in this community are impacted/ influenced by America. Why America? You read the above comments in chronological order, then you get answers to all questions raised in your conclusive comment.</p>
<p>And, you should not conclude by tweaking the message that is black and white in the same post and few comments above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: senthil</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2009/01/19/american-politics-and-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-7991</link>
		<dc:creator>senthil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/?p=1091#comment-7991</guid>
		<description>vamsi.. let me conclude this point..  my core point is that in the name of justice or nuetrality or liberal values, we are taking stands as per our convenience..   i am not saying that we should not question anything..  but, we often take a stand that we are always NOT biased and only others are biased and even accuse the target..  In this post, it is america..  in earlier post it was the society, government, and many other targets..

While the intent of this post and other posts are noble, it itself becomes biased, when we narrow ourself in to one or two factors, instead of taking in to account the larger picture..  and particularly in this post, only the minority factor is considered, and all other factors is ignored.

I just wanted to point this..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vamsi.. let me conclude this point..  my core point is that in the name of justice or nuetrality or liberal values, we are taking stands as per our convenience..   i am not saying that we should not question anything..  but, we often take a stand that we are always NOT biased and only others are biased and even accuse the target..  In this post, it is america..  in earlier post it was the society, government, and many other targets..</p>
<p>While the intent of this post and other posts are noble, it itself becomes biased, when we narrow ourself in to one or two factors, instead of taking in to account the larger picture..  and particularly in this post, only the minority factor is considered, and all other factors is ignored.</p>
<p>I just wanted to point this..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: senthil</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2009/01/19/american-politics-and-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-7990</link>
		<dc:creator>senthil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/?p=1091#comment-7990</guid>
		<description>vamsi,

Let me take the same logic..  Which country allows the minority to become PM?  Why is only america questioned?

We are closing the loop and came back to the starting point of this post :) ..

Also, your hatred for BJP doesnt make you recognize the fact that BJP is not controlled by any single family..  NOT even by its idelogical founder RSS..  it has considerable internal democracy..

Btw, i am a strong supporter of Modi,..  its not few people..  but a lot of people all across country support him ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vamsi,</p>
<p>Let me take the same logic..  Which country allows the minority to become PM?  Why is only america questioned?</p>
<p>We are closing the loop and came back to the starting point of this post <img src='http://www.sastwingees.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ..</p>
<p>Also, your hatred for BJP doesnt make you recognize the fact that BJP is not controlled by any single family..  NOT even by its idelogical founder RSS..  it has considerable internal democracy..</p>
<p>Btw, i am a strong supporter of Modi,..  its not few people..  but a lot of people all across country support him ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vamsi</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2009/01/19/american-politics-and-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-7989</link>
		<dc:creator>vamsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/?p=1091#comment-7989</guid>
		<description>Senthil,
That is the whole point. That point itself is not big enough for opposing any party. Which Indian party has real internal democracy? You can list down the number of internal elections conducted where many second level leaders were given a chance to go to the top post? Dont say BJP&#039;s 3 year (or 2 years) rotation of it&#039;s President. All I hear is two names - ABV and LKA. These days some Gujaratis or few extreme right wingers naming NM. Can you please enlighten me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senthil,<br />
That is the whole point. That point itself is not big enough for opposing any party. Which Indian party has real internal democracy? You can list down the number of internal elections conducted where many second level leaders were given a chance to go to the top post? Dont say BJP&#8217;s 3 year (or 2 years) rotation of it&#8217;s President. All I hear is two names &#8211; ABV and LKA. These days some Gujaratis or few extreme right wingers naming NM. Can you please enlighten me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: senthil</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2009/01/19/american-politics-and-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-7977</link>
		<dc:creator>senthil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 07:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/?p=1091#comment-7977</guid>
		<description>/** And elements like Modi incite violence against minorities and destroy places of prayer in the name of religion. **/

Ganesh..  We will have this discussion on a separate post...  But this is unsubstantiated accusation on your part..  you seem to be towing the line of the ELM.. (Engligh Language Media)..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/** And elements like Modi incite violence against minorities and destroy places of prayer in the name of religion. **/</p>
<p>Ganesh..  We will have this discussion on a separate post&#8230;  But this is unsubstantiated accusation on your part..  you seem to be towing the line of the ELM.. (Engligh Language Media)..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

