Comments on: The Real History of India – Part 6: Aryan Invasion Theory http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/24/the-real-history-of-india-part-6-aryan-invasion-theory/ Knowledge is Scrumptious Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:13:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: senthil http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/24/the-real-history-of-india-part-6-aryan-invasion-theory/comment-page-3/#comment-20739 senthil Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:19:12 +0000 http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/24/the-real-history-of-india-part-6-aryan-invasion-theory/#comment-20739 An 8000 year old civilization has been found along konkan coast.. the below DNA link has photos showing 24 km man made wall 3 metres below the sea level.. http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/slideshow_photos-8000-year-old-advanced-civilisation-in-konkan-coast_1547920-1 Similarly, the dwaraka submerged city, the poompukar submerged cities are not yet excavated.. It is pretty clear that the entire western history has to be thrown to the dustbin along with their dating.. we need to realise that western history is a colonial project to claim white superiority over the rest.. An 8000 year old civilization has been found along konkan coast.. the below DNA link has photos showing 24 km man made wall 3 metres below the sea level..

http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/slideshow_photos-8000-year-old-advanced-civilisation-in-konkan-coast_1547920-1

Similarly, the dwaraka submerged city, the poompukar submerged cities are not yet excavated.. It is pretty clear that the entire western history has to be thrown to the dustbin along with their dating.. we need to realise that western history is a colonial project to claim white superiority over the rest..

]]> By: senthil http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/24/the-real-history-of-india-part-6-aryan-invasion-theory/comment-page-3/#comment-19970 senthil Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:53:03 +0000 http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/24/the-real-history-of-india-part-6-aryan-invasion-theory/#comment-19970 The western History on india is centered around the Alexander Conquest of India.. but if we look at the source of alexander history, we find these were written based on accounts, written some 200 years later.. so its almost a hearsay account, written at a very later period.. the western historian says this is a scientific proof, and indians accept this meekly.. For a alternate perspective on alexander's invasion, pls read the following article, which is full of reference.. http://2ndlook.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/alexanders-conquest-of-india/ Porus was just a small king at the frontiers of india, and western historians project as though alexander had worn the entire indian continent by this one war.. Yet no one here is ready to question that stand.. (the white people had said it and hence it should be true) the truth is very clear.. Alexander's army were frightened by the elephant fleet of 100 deployed by porus.. and the fact that chandragupta army has 6000 elephants is what made the alexander army revolt against him.. Now, having known that Horse was NOT a significant force by indian kings, and that elephants were reared for long, for which evidence is found as IVC seals, the entire junk on this AIT or AMT should be reviewed.. the so called scientific proof had been artificially constructed with narrow focus.. The western History on india is centered around the Alexander Conquest of India.. but if we look at the source of alexander history, we find these were written based on accounts, written some 200 years later.. so its almost a hearsay account, written at a very later period.. the western historian says this is a scientific proof, and indians accept this meekly..

For a alternate perspective on alexander’s invasion, pls read the following article, which is full of reference..

http://2ndlook.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/alexanders-conquest-of-india/

Porus was just a small king at the frontiers of india, and western historians project as though alexander had worn the entire indian continent by this one war.. Yet no one here is ready to question that stand.. (the white people had said it and hence it should be true)

the truth is very clear.. Alexander’s army were frightened by the elephant fleet of 100 deployed by porus.. and the fact that chandragupta army has 6000 elephants is what made the alexander army revolt against him..

Now, having known that Horse was NOT a significant force by indian kings, and that elephants were reared for long, for which evidence is found as IVC seals, the entire junk on this AIT or AMT should be reviewed.. the so called scientific proof had been artificially constructed with narrow focus..

]]> By: senthil http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/24/the-real-history-of-india-part-6-aryan-invasion-theory/comment-page-3/#comment-19961 senthil Fri, 29 Apr 2011 06:25:57 +0000 http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/24/the-real-history-of-india-part-6-aryan-invasion-theory/#comment-19961 And what did alexander took away from his Indian Expedition? 2 lakh indian zebu humped cattles, elephants, Macedonian National dress (the salwar) and the KISS .. http://2ndlook.wordpress.com/2009/02/17/what-happened-to-alexanders-loot-from-india/ Elephants were a prized possession and rule changers in the war.. the cavalry unit failed miserably against war elephants.. The horses just could not stand before elephant's trumpheting.. So with a large elephant fleet, indian rulers did not consider horse as important constituent.. This elephant factor has never been considered by any of the western historians? Why? Colonial Prejudice? or Colonial bias? And what did alexander took away from his Indian Expedition? 2 lakh indian zebu humped cattles, elephants, Macedonian National dress (the salwar) and the KISS ..

http://2ndlook.wordpress.com/2009/02/17/what-happened-to-alexanders-loot-from-india/

Elephants were a prized possession and rule changers in the war.. the cavalry unit failed miserably against war elephants.. The horses just could not stand before elephant’s trumpheting..

So with a large elephant fleet, indian rulers did not consider horse as important constituent..

This elephant factor has never been considered by any of the western historians? Why? Colonial Prejudice? or Colonial bias?

]]> By: senthil http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/24/the-real-history-of-india-part-6-aryan-invasion-theory/comment-page-3/#comment-19960 senthil Fri, 29 Apr 2011 06:14:33 +0000 http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/24/the-real-history-of-india-part-6-aryan-invasion-theory/#comment-19960 How elephants were crucial factor in victory of many european battles? Pls read this link.. The Hannibals Elephants.. http://2ndlook.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/hannibals-elephants/ The Stanford University and british archeology did a project tracing hannibal's alpine route with an indian elephant.. more interesting links and references on the above article.. And Hannibals started his campaign against Rome with 37 elephants, but only one elephant survived when he reached there.. and this one elephant was a deciding factor in his victory against them.. the romans just shivered and uriniated at the very sight of this gigantic beast.. How elephants were crucial factor in victory of many european battles? Pls read this link.. The Hannibals Elephants..

http://2ndlook.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/hannibals-elephants/

The Stanford University and british archeology did a project tracing hannibal’s alpine route with an indian elephant.. more interesting links and references on the above article..

And Hannibals started his campaign against Rome with 37 elephants, but only one elephant survived when he reached there.. and this one elephant was a deciding factor in his victory against them.. the romans just shivered and uriniated at the very sight of this gigantic beast..

]]> By: senthil http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/24/the-real-history-of-india-part-6-aryan-invasion-theory/comment-page-3/#comment-19958 senthil Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:53:13 +0000 http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/02/24/the-real-history-of-india-part-6-aryan-invasion-theory/#comment-19958 I came across this site recently, which gives a different picture of Saraswathi Civilization.. (referred as IVC here).. The utility value of elephants is far more than the horses, and india had developed a very advanced elephant fleet, which no other country could do so even till today.. http://2ndlook.wordpress.com/2010/02/25/military-idiom-in-the-indus-saraswati-region/#comment-4384 Horse was NOT central to saraswathi civilization, and the effectiveness of cavalry was nullified with a elephant fleet.. Having so many elephant seals, in saraswathi civilization, its very clear, that elephant had been widely in use during that period.. So when horse was referred as a mark of cilivilization, we can very well take on taming of elpephant as a reference point of our civilization.. I came across this site recently, which gives a different picture of Saraswathi Civilization.. (referred as IVC here)..

The utility value of elephants is far more than the horses, and india had developed a very advanced elephant fleet, which no other country could do so even till today..

http://2ndlook.wordpress.com/2010/02/25/military-idiom-in-the-indus-saraswati-region/#comment-4384

Horse was NOT central to saraswathi civilization, and the effectiveness of cavalry was nullified with a elephant fleet..

Having so many elephant seals, in saraswathi civilization, its very clear, that elephant had been widely in use during that period.. So when horse was referred as a mark of cilivilization, we can very well take on taming of elpephant as a reference point of our civilization..

]]>