Comments on: The Real History of India Part 1 – The Gond-Australian Aborigine Connection? http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/27/gond-australian-aborigine-connection/ Knowledge is Scrumptious Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:24:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: deeepak bara http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/27/gond-australian-aborigine-connection/comment-page-3/#comment-12649 deeepak bara Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:18:27 +0000 http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/27/gond-australian-aborigine-connection/#comment-12649 well a very good effort....in finding the real history.......of india......world. i look at it in different ways being a tribal....ORAON a tribe ........i feel not only paintings but the ancient languages,,,tribal languages speak the real history, un polluted by outside world......i believe, SANTHALI is the base of world languages. i'm a researcher tooo...with a different perspective.......aaaaaart is a part of evidences. well a very good effort….in finding the real history…….of india……world.

i look at it in different ways being a tribal….ORAON a tribe ……..i feel not only paintings but the ancient languages,,,tribal languages speak the real history, un polluted by outside world……i believe, SANTHALI is the base of world languages. i’m a researcher tooo…with a different perspective…….aaaaaart is a part of evidences.

]]> By: Didi Anandarama http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/27/gond-australian-aborigine-connection/comment-page-3/#comment-11791 Didi Anandarama Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:51:31 +0000 http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/27/gond-australian-aborigine-connection/#comment-11791 Just the fact that the ancient continent got the name from the Gonds puts these people as quite ancient. India was not India that time and India's culture as it is today developed and flourished without them obviously for many reasons that does not diminish the value of the Gonds and the Aboriginals or the Maoris. I think their dignified place in the world will still be established in the future as we research more and hpefully discover some very amazing traces of the past from them. I don't think the Gonds move to Australia, I think the link between them is Gondwanaland. I think it may be that they developed independently from each other after the split of Gondwanaland but the these people had similar environments to emerge as Australopitecus and then as Home Erectus and finally Homo Sapiens. It is about 1 million years ago that the Homo Sapiens developed unique characteristics due to the environment which cause the four primary races from the same stock : the Austrics, the Negroids, the Mongoloids and the Aryans. The Dravidians is a blend of Negroids and Austrics. Just the fact that the ancient continent got the name from the Gonds puts these people as quite ancient. India was not India that time and India’s culture as it is today developed and flourished without them obviously for many reasons that does not diminish the value of the Gonds and the Aboriginals or the Maoris.
I think their dignified place in the world will still be established in the future as we research more and hpefully discover some very amazing traces of the past from them.

I don’t think the Gonds move to Australia, I think the link between them is Gondwanaland. I think it may be that they developed independently from each other after the split of Gondwanaland but the these people had similar environments to emerge as Australopitecus and then as Home Erectus and finally Homo Sapiens.
It is about 1 million years ago that the Homo Sapiens developed unique characteristics due to the environment which cause the four primary races from the same stock : the Austrics, the Negroids, the Mongoloids and the Aryans. The Dravidians is a blend of Negroids and Austrics.

]]> By: Jonathan Anthony Manickam http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/27/gond-australian-aborigine-connection/comment-page-3/#comment-11776 Jonathan Anthony Manickam Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:50:41 +0000 http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/27/gond-australian-aborigine-connection/#comment-11776 There is much hue and cry about the aboes and Indians....nobody can say for sure that this people came from India and even if they did they are not the original indians of India or the Dravida people. They could have been the indegenious people who were probably chased off from the beautiful land. Up till this very day,there are still leftover hill tribes in India and they resemble very much of the Australian aboes. They are not Indians or Dravidians...otherwise they could have brought the rich culture of India to Australia. India was civilised at that time;the aboes untill today remains depressingly unable of a self goverment. There is much hue and cry about the aboes and Indians….nobody can say for sure that this people came from India and even if they did they are not the original indians of India or the Dravida people. They could have been the indegenious people who were probably chased off from the beautiful land. Up till this very day,there are still leftover hill tribes in India and they resemble very much of the Australian aboes. They are not Indians or Dravidians…otherwise they could have brought the rich culture of India to Australia. India was civilised at that time;the aboes untill today remains depressingly unable of a self goverment.

]]> By: Didi Anandarama http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/27/gond-australian-aborigine-connection/comment-page-3/#comment-11668 Didi Anandarama Sun, 02 Aug 2009 12:58:45 +0000 http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/27/gond-australian-aborigine-connection/#comment-11668 Gondwana named because the Gond people of the Austric race lived in the central portion, although this portion was not the oldest part of the oldest land mass of the world – consisted mainly of a long island in an archipelago, presently the Arabian Sea, the Bay of Bengal, the Indonesian Archipelago, the Deccan plateau, South East Asia, eastern portion of Africa, South Africa and Oceania. Gondwanaland was about 300 million years ago. The Austrics inhabited the southern portion of Gondwanaland, the Negroes inhabited the southwestern portion and the Austrico-Negroids, the Dravidians of today, inhabited the central portion. Australia and Austria got the name from the Austric people. The Gonds are closely related to the Aboriginals and Maoriis of Australia. Ráŕh – the oldest part of this Gondwanaland that has remained above the sea – was the birth place of human beings. The hills of Anandanagar in Ráŕh are also at least 300 million years old. So the early ancestors of human beings indeed came from this Gondawana land from the same stock of Australopitecus and spread all over the world about 1million years ago. Source: P. R. Sarkar (aka Shrii Shrii Anandamurti) Didi A. Rama Gondwana named because the Gond people of the Austric race lived in the central portion, although this portion was not the oldest part of the oldest land mass of the world – consisted mainly of a long island in an archipelago, presently the Arabian Sea, the Bay of Bengal, the Indonesian Archipelago, the Deccan plateau, South East Asia, eastern portion of Africa, South Africa and Oceania. Gondwanaland was about 300 million years ago.

The Austrics inhabited the southern portion of Gondwanaland, the Negroes inhabited the southwestern portion and the Austrico-Negroids, the Dravidians of today, inhabited the central portion. Australia and Austria got the name from the Austric people. The Gonds are closely related to the Aboriginals and Maoriis of Australia.

Ráŕh – the oldest part of this Gondwanaland that has remained above the sea – was the birth place of human beings. The hills of Anandanagar in Ráŕh are also at least 300 million years old.

So the early ancestors of human beings indeed came from this Gondawana land from the same stock of Australopitecus and spread all over the world about 1million years ago.

Source: P. R. Sarkar (aka Shrii Shrii Anandamurti)
Didi A. Rama

]]> By: Sridhar. N http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/27/gond-australian-aborigine-connection/comment-page-3/#comment-3548 Sridhar. N Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:10:40 +0000 http://www.sastwingees.org/2008/01/27/gond-australian-aborigine-connection/#comment-3548 Hi Senthilraja, The things you were discussing were interesting. I have follwed it upto Jan 29, 2008. Catch up with you after a while. Now I would like to say something on your question on Periyar and Brahmins.. One fact is Periyar lived in Agraharam so you can understand his attitude towards them. You have missed Vaikom. One interesting thing about Brahmins( includes Telugu, Tamil and Marathi) if you look at the base land documents given by the British, all the fertile lands on the banks of the Cauvery are in the names of these Brahmins. If you look at the location of agraharam, mostly it will be located at river or canal entry point to the village or town. Hi Senthilraja,

The things you were discussing were interesting. I have follwed it upto Jan 29, 2008. Catch up with you after a while. Now I would like to say something on your question on Periyar and Brahmins..

One fact is Periyar lived in Agraharam so you can understand his attitude towards them. You have missed Vaikom.

One interesting thing about Brahmins( includes Telugu, Tamil and Marathi) if you look at the base land documents given by the British, all the fertile lands on the banks of the Cauvery are in the names of these Brahmins. If you look at the location of agraharam, mostly it will be located at river or canal entry point to the village or town.

]]>