<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Made to Stick &#8211; Brilliant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sastwingees.org/2007/07/22/made-to-stick-brilliant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2007/07/22/made-to-stick-brilliant/</link>
	<description>Knowledge is Scrumptious</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2007/07/22/made-to-stick-brilliant/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/2007/07/22/made-to-stick-brilliant/#comment-677</guid>
		<description>Archana,

I think there&#039;s a distinction between complex and detailed. In the case of urban legends the details merely add more data and thereby boost credbility. Whereas in the case of HP, the details are needed to explain the complex world that JKR has created. -Sukumar

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Archana,</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s a distinction between complex and detailed. In the case of urban legends the details merely add more data and thereby boost credbility. Whereas in the case of HP, the details are needed to explain the complex world that JKR has created. -Sukumar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2007/07/22/made-to-stick-brilliant/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 05:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/2007/07/22/made-to-stick-brilliant/#comment-676</guid>
		<description>Sukumar, you comment on Urban legends &quot;urban legend has so many pertinent details that it becomes very believable&quot; is very interesting. This is one of the reasons people give for the success of HP; the magical world JKR has built is so detailed.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sukumar, you comment on Urban legends &#8220;urban legend has so many pertinent details that it becomes very believable&#8221; is very interesting. This is one of the reasons people give for the success of HP; the magical world JKR has built is so detailed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2007/07/22/made-to-stick-brilliant/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/2007/07/22/made-to-stick-brilliant/#comment-675</guid>
		<description>Sorry I meant to say we could take issue with Simple but possibly not with Credible. The authors also give examples of urban legends (hoaxes) that become very sticky eventhough they ultimately turn out to be untrue. The authors reason that it happens because the urban legend has so many pertinent details that it becomes very believable. I had written a post a while ago on this blog on what makes something a classic. Iam planning to dust it up and do a repost tying it to this book&#039;s theory - Sukumar

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I meant to say we could take issue with Simple but possibly not with Credible. The authors also give examples of urban legends (hoaxes) that become very sticky eventhough they ultimately turn out to be untrue. The authors reason that it happens because the urban legend has so many pertinent details that it becomes very believable. I had written a post a while ago on this blog on what makes something a classic. Iam planning to dust it up and do a repost tying it to this book&#8217;s theory &#8211; Sukumar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2007/07/22/made-to-stick-brilliant/comment-page-1/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/2007/07/22/made-to-stick-brilliant/#comment-674</guid>
		<description>Another insightful comment Archana. For Simple, one of the examples is the Palm Pilot CEO Hawkins showing a block of wood to say how simple the palm pilot should be. Incidentally Akio Morita used the same technique to convey his vision of a pocket radio to his team.

I think based on the discussion we&#039;ve been having, we can take issue with Simple but possibly not with Complex.

All the examples you quote patriotism, racism etc were considered credible at the time they were popularized. Of course, Patriotism is still in vogues. As late as 2 years ago, a Harvard University President made a speech about how women were inferior to men. I definitely think that an idea has to be credible for it to be sticky. Of course, we must adjust for the context because in the original context something could be credible. Human beings are special is similar. Now research is showing that it may not be the case but when the idea was propounded we didn&#039;t have data to show otherwise. - Sukumar

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another insightful comment Archana. For Simple, one of the examples is the Palm Pilot CEO Hawkins showing a block of wood to say how simple the palm pilot should be. Incidentally Akio Morita used the same technique to convey his vision of a pocket radio to his team.</p>
<p>I think based on the discussion we&#8217;ve been having, we can take issue with Simple but possibly not with Complex.</p>
<p>All the examples you quote patriotism, racism etc were considered credible at the time they were popularized. Of course, Patriotism is still in vogues. As late as 2 years ago, a Harvard University President made a speech about how women were inferior to men. I definitely think that an idea has to be credible for it to be sticky. Of course, we must adjust for the context because in the original context something could be credible. Human beings are special is similar. Now research is showing that it may not be the case but when the idea was propounded we didn&#8217;t have data to show otherwise. &#8211; Sukumar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2007/07/22/made-to-stick-brilliant/comment-page-1/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/2007/07/22/made-to-stick-brilliant/#comment-673</guid>
		<description>I have been thinking of all the long standing ideas and wondering if there are any common criteria. For example, the following

Patriotism

Chastity &amp; fidelity

Inequality of women

Racism

Human beings are special

They are neither simple nor credible, but they have a strong emotional component. I could not think of any new idea that has stuck like these. Now, I am really curious about the examples in the book.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been thinking of all the long standing ideas and wondering if there are any common criteria. For example, the following</p>
<p>Patriotism</p>
<p>Chastity &#038; fidelity</p>
<p>Inequality of women</p>
<p>Racism</p>
<p>Human beings are special</p>
<p>They are neither simple nor credible, but they have a strong emotional component. I could not think of any new idea that has stuck like these. Now, I am really curious about the examples in the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

