<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Apple mess up, again? (with the iPod)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sastwingees.org/2006/09/19/could-apple-mess-up-again-with-the-ipod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2006/09/19/could-apple-mess-up-again-with-the-ipod/</link>
	<description>Knowledge is Scrumptious</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2006/09/19/could-apple-mess-up-again-with-the-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 09:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/2006/09/19/could-apple-mess-up-again-with-the-ipod/#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Thanks Pratyoosh. I somehow think MS with its Zune will be the no.2 and give Apple some serious competition. I think it has some aces up its sleeve. i am investigating and i will report back.

Thanks

Sukumar

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Pratyoosh. I somehow think MS with its Zune will be the no.2 and give Apple some serious competition. I think it has some aces up its sleeve. i am investigating and i will report back.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Sukumar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sastwingees.org/2006/09/19/could-apple-mess-up-again-with-the-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sastwingees.org/2006/09/19/could-apple-mess-up-again-with-the-ipod/#comment-240</guid>
		<description>As pointed out ,it&#039;s true that iPod is largely integrated out of 3rd party modular components &amp; on the top of this there have been reports of apple applying for patent several aspects of the iPod

About half the claims are for things that were implemented in prior players (e.g., Archos), and the other half are for things that are in many other common device interfaces (DVD players, PVRs) and the only novelty is that Apple put them on a portable music player.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&amp;r=1&amp;p=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;d=PG01&amp;S1=20040055446&amp;OS=20040055446&amp;RS=20040055446&quot;    rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;more here&lt;/a&gt;

People buy an iPod because it is simply the most popular music player.Its design is brilliant &amp; nothing can take the credit away from Apple&#039;s design team.

The nearest competition to iPod comes through Micro$oft Zune,but still Micro$oft guys couldn&#039;t come out of lame copying &amp; useless DRM frills attached psycology.People won&#039;t buy an alternative just because it supports a couple of more formats or some useless features.But as pointed in the post you need to have a really good buisness strategy in order to compete with iPod.

DRM is hardly an issue with iPods,iPods and iTunes will both play unencumbered mp3s, and iTunes is perfectly happy to rip CDs to unencumbered mp3s.iPod supports DRM. It doesn&#039;t require it.Apple guys are smart enough not to mess up there.

But the fact remains that Sony Walkman&#039;s died &amp; so would iPod,sooner rather than later if they don&#039;t innovate something like iPhone with video audio and net functions.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As pointed out ,it&#8217;s true that iPod is largely integrated out of 3rd party modular components &#038; on the top of this there have been reports of apple applying for patent several aspects of the iPod</p>
<p>About half the claims are for things that were implemented in prior players (e.g., Archos), and the other half are for things that are in many other common device interfaces (DVD players, PVRs) and the only novelty is that Apple put them on a portable music player.</p>
<p><a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&#038;Sect2=HITOFF&#038;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&#038;r=1&#038;p=1&#038;f=G&#038;l=50&#038;d=PG01&#038;S1=20040055446&#038;OS=20040055446&#038;RS=20040055446"    rel="nofollow">more here</a></p>
<p>People buy an iPod because it is simply the most popular music player.Its design is brilliant &#038; nothing can take the credit away from Apple&#8217;s design team.</p>
<p>The nearest competition to iPod comes through Micro$oft Zune,but still Micro$oft guys couldn&#8217;t come out of lame copying &#038; useless DRM frills attached psycology.People won&#8217;t buy an alternative just because it supports a couple of more formats or some useless features.But as pointed in the post you need to have a really good buisness strategy in order to compete with iPod.</p>
<p>DRM is hardly an issue with iPods,iPods and iTunes will both play unencumbered mp3s, and iTunes is perfectly happy to rip CDs to unencumbered mp3s.iPod supports DRM. It doesn&#8217;t require it.Apple guys are smart enough not to mess up there.</p>
<p>But the fact remains that Sony Walkman&#8217;s died &#038; so would iPod,sooner rather than later if they don&#8217;t innovate something like iPhone with video audio and net functions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

